|
|
| |
| Reviews |
| |
| |
Goto a review for:
With Intent to Kill
Absent Witness
Final Justice
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
Acts & Omissions
| |
| |
| |
The Capitol Times, September 23, 1994: by Bob Meloon Court Commissioner blends law, murder, suspense.
|
|
| |
| |
"Acts and
Omissions" is a murder mystery novel that will keep you in suspense until page
425 of this 431-page pocket book. That’s what murder mysteries are supposed to
do. What sets this book apart from run-of-the-mill mysteries is the strong
development of the characters. You get to know them
intimately.
This book could
easily be converted into a screenplay for a movie or, more likely, a
made-for-television movie. As a mainly nonfiction reader, I found myself getting
a little impatient with the minute details of each character’s
life.
But for those who
want to know the characters, all the information is there. "Acts and Omissions"
is the first novel for Nancy Kopp, a Rock County farm girl turned lawyer, turned
novelist. She lives in Maple Bluff with her three cats and is a court
commissioner for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
A 1983 graduate of
the University of Wisconsin Law School, she has always been interested in
writing, mainly short stories. About six years ago she and two friends
collaborated on a proposed book, but it didn’t take off.
Then, influenced by
the Jeffrey Dahmer serial killings and the Kimberly Bergalis case in Florida in
which a young woman contracted AIDS from her dentist, Kopp was inspired to again
tackle book writing. With serial killings and a major lawsuit as the main pegs,
she outlined the book that took about a year to write.
The plot revolves
around Megan Lansdorf, a brilliant and beautiful Chicago lawyer, trying to make
partner in her firm. She is assigned a major case in which the defendant
acquired AIDS from her doctor.
The hospital where
the doctor was on staff fought vigorously against the lawsuit, refusing to make
a settlement. At the same time, Lansdorf is the unknowing target of a serial
killer.
A number of young
women were being murdered in Chicago, apparently by a serial killer, leading to
the appointment of Mike O’Riley, an about-to-retire policeman, as head of the
task force investigating the murders.
The pressures of
O’Riley’s retirement desires and his agreement to see the case through past his
retirement date add to the novel’s interest. Other characters provide strong
possibilities as to whether they might be involved in the murders, building to
the suspenseful mystery.
There is enough
court work in the novel to take advantage of the current interest in the legal
system spawned by the O. J. Simpson murder case.
A good start for the
court commissioner.
|
|
| |
| |
Romantic Times, September 1994 (Excellent)
|
|
| |
| |
It was Attorney Megan Lansdorf’s bad luck to be assigned to handle the case of patients suing a major
hospital for negligence in an AIDS related lawsuit. Megan knew that if she
performed well on this case, she would be eligible to become a partner at her
law firm. Megan would have had a much better shot at winning the case and
holding on to her temper, if the defending counsel wasn’t the arrogant and
aggravating Frank Parks.
Frank Parks cut few people,
including himself, any slack. He was an expert at making things as difficult as
possible for the opposing counsel in a lawsuit. Well aware that he set Megan
Lansdorf’s teeth on edge, Frank was looking forward to the upcoming
battle.
Detective Lieutenant Mike
O’Riley of the Chicago Police force was just weeks away from retirement when the
horrific killings began. It soon becomes apparent that Chicago is dealing with a
vicious serial killer. Asked by the Mayor to stay on and head up the
investigation, O’Riley realizes that all the victims bear a startling
resemblance to one another. What is even more terrifying is that all of the
victims look exactly like Megan. What is the killer’s connection to Megan? Is
Megan the next in line, or was she the original
target?
Author Nancy Kopp’s ACTS
& OMISSIONS is a taut and intriguing thriller that combines the desperation
of a hunt for a serial killer with the courtroom dramatics of a high profile
lawsuit.
return to top
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
With Intent to Kill
| |
| |
| |
Patricia L. Grove,* March 2000 Wisconsin Lawyer
|
|
| |
| |
The cover of Nancy Kopp’s novel touts the book as “electrifying legal suspense!” I put this to the test by
reading it at Disney World. The result: a page-turner from beginning to end,
with engrossing characters, snappy dialogue, and intriguing legal
drama.
The story unfolds in Oakwood,
Wis., a picturesque town where murder just doesn’t happen. Detective Jeff
Gardner is summoned to investigate the brutal slaying of 4-year-old Jeremy
Barker, son of Oakwood’s most prominent widower, Tom Barker. Gardner joins
forces in his investigation of the slaying with Liz Stanfeld, Oakwood’s
attractive assistant district attorney, herself a prominent resident due, in
large part, to a recent and lucrative divorce settlement.
After her divorce, Stanfeld
left Milwaukee’s largest law firm, moved to Oakwood to simplify her life, and
joined the D.A.’s office. With her considerable trial experience, Stanfeld is
tapped by the D.A. who is seeking to become the next U. S. Attorney for the
Eastern District of Wisconsin, and with whom Stanfeld has become romantically
involved, to prosecute this high-profile murder.
Gardner and Stanfeld square off
in a comical but trite “cops versus lawyers” pursuit of whodunit. Initially,
Stanfeld is bothered by Gardner’s investigative techniques, and the two are
frequently at odds over who and how to investigate. Kopp’s amusing, clever
dialogue breathes life into the characters.
The investigation turns to the
usual suspect, a ne’er-do-well whose glasses were found at the crime scene, and
whose alibi leaks. Stanfeld considers him the prime suspect. Gardner disagrees
and their difference in perspective contributes to animosity between the police
and the D.A.’s office.
As the novel progresses, a
subplot involves the growing personal interest between Stanfeld and Tom Barker.
Kopp handles this relationship skillfully, with the result that readers care
whether their professional relationship develops into a personal
one.
Meanwhile, Gardner continues
the investigation by interviewing virtually every town resident, including
children, to uncover a lead. Two teenage boys, sons of prominent families,
become prime suspects. Oakwood rallies to support the two unlikely young
killers, chastising both the police department and the D.A. for their seemingly
politically incorrect arrests.
Kopp skillfully details the
extreme contrast in characters of the two suspects. One is shy, inarticulate,
and clearly in over his head. The other is self-assured, charismatic, and has an
I.Q. of 150. Gardner is convinced the second suspect is truly evil but his
investigation turns up nothing but accolades for the teen -- until Gardner
locates a former teacher. The teacher, of course, has personal baggage that
Stanfeld fears make him a cross-examiner’s dream.
The suspect’s family hires a
high-powered attorney to square off against Stanfeld. The legal maneuvering that
follows is absorbing, thanks to the fact that Kopp is an attorney herself. As
the tension mounts to bring the suspects to justice, Stanfeld and Gardner become
allies in pursuit of meeting the burden of proof. Stanfeld comes to admire
Gardner for his tenacity, and Gardner grows to respect Stanfeld for her legal
talents and mental toughness in pursuing an unpopular conviction in the midst of
a hostile community.
Stanfeld and Gardner need a
break to find some evidence to crack the case in this seemingly uphill legal
battle. You will have to read the book to discover how the case and
relationships turn out. Kopp has woven a neat legal thriller that one would
expect to unfold on the big screen.
*Patricia L. Grove, Tulsa 1981,
practices with Halling & Cayo, S.C., Milwaukee
|
|
| |
| |
Mystery News, Dec./Jan. 1999
|
|
| |
| |
Nancy Kopp once again
writes a novel that is well worth the time it takes to read it. The small,
affluent community of Oakwood is rocked to its very core when a brutal
kidnapping/murder of a four-year-old child occurs in its very
midst.
Assistant District Attorney
Liz Stanfeld, newly relocated to Oakwood, is assigned to this case, even though
she does not have the seniority to merit it. She does her best to prosecute, and
finds herself intimately participating in the investigation, something that she
has never done before. Oakwood, putting the pressure on the District Attorney to
solve the case, puts her in a difficult position when she is forced to go
against her District Attorney boyfriend’s wishes. Her moral struggles eventually
win out and she must face some difficult
choices.
This novel, like Kopp’s
Acts & Omissions, is an admirable portrayal of the moral decisions that many
of us may someday have to face. Altogether a satisfying read, and will leave you
wanting more chapters.
|
|
| |
| |
Mystery Time & Rhyme Time (Nov. 18, 1998)
|
|
| |
| |
When you pick up "With
Intent to Kill," be prepared to shut out the world for several hours while Nancy
Kopp takes you into her world with riveting action and fast-paced drama. Fans of
Margaret Yorke will recognize a kindred spirit in Liz Stanfeld, a wife dumped
for a younger woman and fighting to keep her life and career in some semblance
of order. Her biggest case as a prosecutor in the District Attorney’s office
brings her into conflict with her boss (who is also her lover), the chauvinistic
detective investigating the gruesome murder of a four-year-old, and her
neighbors who blame Stanfeld for the arrest of the killer. Class prejudice,
money and politics play their parts, too, as Stanfeld sticks to her principles
and triumphs, both as woman and as prosecutor. Kopp brings her legal background
to bear in writing a richly authentic plot.
|
|
| |
| |
Harriet Klausner, Painted Rock Review, September 8,1998: ***** Don't do an act of omission by missing this legal thriller.
|
|
| |
| |
Following her divorce, Liz
Stanfeld decides she needs a change of scenery. She no longer wants to live or
work in Milwaukee, even though she is employed as an attorney by the biggest law
firm in Wisconsin. Liz moves to the affluent suburb of Oakwood and becomes
Horicon County Assistant District Attorney. At thirty-five, Liz is beginning to
relish life once again.
However, her idyllic
lifestyle is abruptly shattered when the police locate the murdered corpse of
four-year-old Jeremy Barker. The victim died from continual blows to his head.
The shocked townsfolk want fast answers because no one seems able to accept that
a monster lives among them. Her boss Harry Washburn assigns Liz the case. She
knows that she must quickly uncover the identity of the killer and follow that
up with a prosecution that convicts the culprit of first degree murder even if
the killer is a member of one of the most affluent families in the
area.
WITH INTENT TO KILL is an
exciting legal thriller that will bring critical acclaim and fan praise to Nancy
Kopp. The invigorating story line provides a well written fictional account of
something that could have easily been a true crime, especially the exhilarative
trial sequence. The characters are all top rate, but remarkably outstanding is
Liz, a fantastic protagonist, who hopefully will make future appearances.
Sub-genre fans should try this novel and Ms. Kopp’s previous story, ACTS &
OMISSIONS, because both are quite entertaining.
return to top
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
Absent Witness
| |
| |
| |
Gila Shoshany*, April 2000 Wisconsin Lawyer
|
|
| |
| |
ABSENT WITNESS is Nancy
Kopp’s third lawyer mystery. The author, a Wisconsin Supreme Court commissioner,
had fun writing this. Characters share names (and traits) with court staffers
and several prominent Wisconsin attorneys. This playfulness is carried out in
the main character’s irreverent attitude.
Chicago attorney Carrie
Nelson faces a mystery: Who impregnated her clients’ comatose daughter? Subplots
are deftly interwoven as the plot whizzes along to the answer. On the way,
Carrie deflates egotistical senior partners, hostile doctors, slumlords, and
obstinate detectives. Her developing private life also keeps her
busy.
Little details ring true.
When Carrier reports the sexual assault of the comatose victim, she hopes hordes
of squad cars will be dispatched to find the bad guy. When this doesn’t happen,
the author neatly captures the chagrin of a competent civil attorney practicing
outside her field. Similarly, even surprise resolution of the whodunit doesn’t
end the novel -- as in real practice, trial preparation remains after the
discovery period ends. Cleverly, the author tucks another plot surprise into
Carrier’s discovery boxes.
There are minor
annoyances. For instance, even minor characters’ appearances and manners are
described in full, almost like a screenplay. Readers may resent this approach
when they realize these minor characters are unimportant to the action.
Similarly, the characters routinely speak adverbially: softly, wryly, bitterly.
although initially on an even keel, they may “explode” at a question, Invoking
inner state by outer response is standard technique, but too many such
characterizations make the characters oddly labile. Still, these cavils do not
outweigh the pleasures of the plot.
Lawyers looking for a
fast-paced mystery will enjoy reading this one as much as the author enjoyed
writing it.
* Gila Shoshany, U.W.
1987, recently retired from her position as a staff attorney for the Wisconsin
Court of Appeals.
|
|
| |
| |
Chief Justice Roland B. Day (retired), The Third Branch (a publication of the Wisconsin Judiciary) Fall 1999
|
|
| |
| |
Nancy Kopp grew up in
rural Wisconsin. She earned a bachelor’s degree in history at the university of
Wisconsin-Whitewater and graduated magna cum laude from the University of
Wisconsin Law School. She served a one-year term as a law clerk to Justice
William G. Callow of the Wisconsin Supreme Court. She then spent three years in
the litigation department of a large Wisconsin law firm. It was the good fortune
of our Wisconsin Supreme Court that Nancy accepted a position as a court
commissioner. As one of three Supreme Court commissioners, Nancy studies the
cases, writes memoranda, and meets with the Court to make recommendations
regarding matters brought within the Court’s discretionary appellate
jurisdiction. In the course of her work, Nancy Kopp has read countless briefs,
thousands of pages of transcripts of the examinations and cross-examinations of
litigants, witnesses, physicians, psychiatrists, psychologists, and scientific
experts of the various disciplines. In short, she has an ideal background to
write a mystery thriller that will beguile, amuse, and entertain
you!
A friend of ours, who
recently read Nancy Kopp’s previous novel, With Intent to Kill, said, “I like
Nancy Kopp’s writing. She explains legal procedure in a way a lay person can
understand it. She gets inside the heads of the attorney-characters so you know
what they are thinking and how and why they decide what they are going to
do.”
A public relations
program of any bar association that got that reaction would be considered a huge
success!
In Kopp’s most recent
book, Absent Witness, we meet Carrie Nelson, a highly successful civil
litigator. She left a sure chance to become a partner in a large and successful
law firm where “billable hours” were the main driving force to join a smaller
but successful Chicago firm where the best possible service to the client was
the main goal. Multi-million-dollar verdicts and settlements which she achieved
didn’t keep her from representing a group of poor single mothers being evicted
from their apartments for reasons Carrie believed would not stand up under the
fair housing laws.
It was about this time
that the Buckley family sought her help for their daughter, Katherine, cousin of
Carrie’s best friend from college. Katherine lay comatose in a nationally
renowned private mental hospital from head injuries received in an auto accident
eight months earlier. Katherine was now found to be three months pregnant, the
victim, obviously, of a sexual assault. Carrie went to interview the
non-physician, former lawyer who was the administrator of the hospital. He had
only one goal: to deny responsibility and refuse to even consider a monetary
settlement. He maintained it couldn’t’ possibly be any male staff doctor, nurse,
or other hospital employee. Security was claimed to be the best. The patients
were all mentally ill with guardians and presumed incompetent. The position of
the hospital director, hostile and belligerent from the first interview, was
simple: the hospital had absolutely no responsibility in the
matter.
The medical staff
likewise accepted no responsibility: they had never seen anyone act “improperly”
around the victim and had no idea who could have been the perpetrator. A police
detective, after minimal investigation, decided it must be the victim’s
boyfriend, a brilliant law student, who spent many hours sitting by her beside.
The hospital signed onto that theory eagerly. The lawyers, paralegals, and
secretaries at Carrie’s law firm rallied around her, offering support and help.
Among those was a new attorney at the firm and Carrie soon discovered she had
more then a professional interest in him.
With the hospital raising
the barrier of doctor-patient privilege, how can one question the hospital
staff? How does one question potential witnesses -- the dozens of present and
former patients who were in the hospital with Katherine -- who have been
declared incompetent?
This is the challenge
facing Carrie, the civil litigator, who is now adding criminal investigation to
her responsibilities since the cops are of no help at this
stage.
All this comes to a head
when Carrie files an action on behalf of the Buckleys against Jackson Memorial
Hospital. There follow court hearings on requiring hospital staff to respond to
subpoenas, and a request to allow Carrie to question present and former patients
if guardians give written consent. All vigorously opposed by the hospital. How
will the judge decide?
From here on the story
moves fast. A suspect is found dead at his apartment, apparently a suicide . . .
or was it murder? Who, in the hospital hierarchy, knows what is going on? And
who is involved in a life-threatening cover-up? Is Carrie’s life in danger?
Don’t miss the surprise ending!
Another interesting
aspect of this novel is the naming of some of the “good guy” characters after
people in the court system or the legal profession. I recognized several; it
adds to the fun!
This book would be a
great gift, especially from a lawyer to clients. It will, as our friend said,
explain the legal system.
It’s a great way to spend
$6.99!
|
|
| |
| |
Harriet Klausner, Painted Rock Review, September 4,1999
|
|
| |
| |
In Evanston, Illinois, the Jackson
Memorial Hospital is named as one of America’s best health care facilities for
the third straight year. Eight months ago, a pickup truck skidded into
Katherine Buckley’s car, sending her into a coma. A comatose patient all that
time at Jackson, Katherine is now three months pregnant. Her guardians decide
to allow the fetus to develop, but hire attorney Carrie Nelson to learn who
raped their unconscious daughter.
Carrie quickly learns that many people
such as staff and family have legitimate access to Katherine. However, easy
access also exists from other patients and strangers wandering the halls of the
facility. Though her task seems impossible, Carrie finds a witness to the
attack. A mental patient has encoded the information, including the identity of
the rapist, onto a computer disc. Though Carrie now possesses the data, she
sues the hospital, not realizing that someone will do anything, including
murder, to end her case.
Nancy Kopp has written a top rate legal
thriller that centers on some of today’s most difficult social issues, such as
keeping a person alive on life support so a fetus can survive. Ms. Kopp also
tackles out of control sexual impulses that lead to perverse behavior. The
appeal of ABSENT WITNESS remains with the fantastic mystery filled with
misdirection that will thoroughly entertain readers even as they think about the
social issues of modern medicine.
return to top
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
Final Justice
| |
| |
| |
Publishers Weekly, March 4, 2002
|
|
| |
| |
Breakneck pacing and an attention to procedural detail distinguish Kopp’s latest
(after Absent Witness), a legal thriller centered around two controversial issues –
gay rights and abortion. Following the acquittal of two gay bashers in criminal court,
attractive Wisconsin attorney Ann Monroe agrees to represent the young victim, Bill Robinson,
in a civil suit. Ann suspects that there was an egregious breach of conduct on the part of
the D.A. and possibly even the jurors, which caused Robinson’s assailants to be set free,
but when she probes further, she finds that all the major players are unusually tight-lipped
about the case. Meanwhile, a fundamentalist group known as the Lambs of God, which doesn’t
take kindly to her firm’s liberal bent, has labeled Ann the Antichrist and begun sending her
threatening letters for her interference in its Planned Parenthood protests. As the threats
and attempts on Ann’s life escalate, she begins to realize that there may be a connection between
the two cases. The novel’s frenzied pace and constant action help keep the tension high. . . .
|
|
| |
| |
Harriet Klausner, Brookbrowser.com, February 2002
|
|
| |
| |
After being dumped by her fiancé two weeks before their wedding, Wisconsin
attorney Ann Monroe buries herself in her work and doesn’t give a thought to
dating again. Her latest client, Bill Robinson, the victim of gay bashing,
wants her to try his case in civil court since he lost in a jury trial and
his attackers went free. Ann looks at the trial court records but wonders
how anti-gay people were placed on the jury with neither the judge nor the
prosecutor recusing them.
Another client of Ann's, a Planned Parenthood clinic, comes under attack
from a group of extreme religious fundamentalists known as the Lambs of God.
Preacher Charles Tremaine, an enemy of Ann, leads these zealots. She tries to
thwart him once again but she becomes a target of attack from a sub-group within
the main church. A frustrated An calls upon her friends for help and they come
up with links between the two cases that puts the lives of Ann and her allies in danger.
Fans of Nancy Taylor Rosenberg will definitely want to read Nancy Kopp’s latest legal
thriller. The heroine is a strong woman who doesn’t let fear get in her way from doing
the right things even if it means wearing rubber underwear. Her support allies are equally
admirable though Charles and his horde pale in comparison. Although the author provides
an extremely exciting novel, there is a clear social message about hate crimes that Ms. Kopp
cleverly works into the plot.
|
|
| |
| |
Romanceatitsbest.com, March 2002 4 stars
|
|
| |
| |
Ann Monroe has a history as a crusader for justice, even when it is for
an unpopular cause. She has caught flak for this before, even to the point
of being stoned by radical unChristian Christians. Now she has taken on
three cases that bring her back into the line of fire.
First off is the case of a young gay man who was severely beaten but his
attackers got off scot free and now he and his family want to file a civil suit.
Then there is the case of two high school students who are being penalized for
administering life saving “drugs” to a classmate. Finally, an old enemy has
resurfaced and is leading attacks on the local Planned Parenthood clinic. Ann
has faced Reverend Tremaine before; this time it may cost lives. Arson, attempted
murder, and more innocuous attacks all must be suffered as she sorts through to
the truth in an effort to stop the violence. At her side is a new love that has
the potential of healing her burned heart.
It is always a pleasure to discover an author new to me, and Ms. Kopp is no
exception to this. I suspect this is part of a series, though it stands alone
so well that I may be disappointed in this. Unlike many legal thrillers, FINAL JUSTICE
is not polluted with excessive profanity or weighed down with too much detail.
Ann is a heroine that is easy to like, as were all of the supporting cast members.
The romance between her and Ken played just enough of a role in the fast moving
story but did not interfere with the mystery. I truly look forward to tracking
down Ms. Kopp’s backlist now.
|
|
| |
| |
MYSTERY NEWS, June/July 2002
|
|
| |
| |
{A]n engrossing and very suspenseful mystery that takes place mostly outside the courtroom.
This is an excellent novel with an exciting, gripping plot and well-developed, believable characters.
|
|
| |
| |
DEADLY PLEASURES, Summer 2002
|
|
| |
| |
Kopp has developed a very strong character in Ann Monroe. . . . She is willing to stand up for what she believes to be morally right in the face of unreasoning anger. Yet she also is vulnerable enough to want to share her life with a new love, after she had been unceremoniously dumped by her fiancé a mere seventeen days before her wedding.
The author is a Wisconsin Supreme Court Commissioner who is thoroughly familiar with trial practice, though certain events had to be compressed in time in order to fit the periods required to move the book along. The reader gets a good look at motion practice and the day-to-day pressure facing attorneys, . . . [t]his is an entertaining and ultimately satisfying tale of an attorney who puts service to her clients above her own safety.
|
|
| |
| |
COZIES, CAPERS & CRIMES, August/September 2002
|
|
| |
| |
FINAL JUSTICE is a smoothly written, rollercoaster ride from beginning to end. Kopp "ups the stakes" at every turn, which kept me turning the pages until the satisfying conclusion. I recommend this book to anyone who likes a fast-paced, action-packed story.
return to top
|
|
| |
|
|
|